Home/BlogThe Version 6.0 global average lower tropospheric temperature (LT) anomaly for March, 2022 was +0.15 deg. C, up from the February, 2022 value of -0.01 deg. C.
The linear warming trend since January, 1979 still stands at +0.13 C/decade (+0.12 C/decade over the global-averaged oceans, and +0.18 C/decade over global-averaged land).
Various regional LT departures from the 30-year (1991-2020) average for the last 15 months are:
YEAR MO GLOBE NHEM. SHEM. TROPIC USA48 ARCTIC AUST
2021 01 0.12 0.34 -0.09 -0.08 0.36 0.49 -0.52
2021 02 0.20 0.32 0.08 -0.14 -0.66 0.07 -0.27
2021 03 -0.01 0.12 -0.14 -0.29 0.59 -0.78 -0.79
2021 04 -0.05 0.05 -0.15 -0.29 -0.02 0.02 0.29
2021 05 0.08 0.14 0.03 0.06 -0.41 -0.04 0.02
2021 06 -0.01 0.30 -0.32 -0.14 1.44 0.63 -0.76
2021 07 0.20 0.33 0.07 0.13 0.58 0.43 0.80
2021 08 0.17 0.26 0.08 0.07 0.32 0.83 -0.02
2021 09 0.25 0.18 0.33 0.09 0.67 0.02 0.37
2021 10 0.37 0.46 0.27 0.33 0.84 0.63 0.06
2021 11 0.08 0.11 0.06 0.14 0.50 -0.43 -0.29
2021 12 0.21 0.27 0.15 0.03 1.62 0.01 -0.06
2022 01 0.03 0.06 0.00 -0.24 -0.13 0.68 0.09
2022 02 -0.01 0.01 -0.02 -0.24 -0.05 -0.31 -0.50
2022 03 0.15 0.27 0.02 -0.08 0.21 0.74 0.02
The full UAH Global Temperature Report, along with the LT global gridpoint anomaly image for March, 2022 should be available within the next several days here.
The global and regional monthly anomalies for the various atmospheric layers we monitor should be available in the next few days at the following locations:
Lower Troposphere: http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/v6.0/tlt/uahncdc_lt_6.0.txt
Mid-Troposphere: http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/v6.0/tmt/uahncdc_mt_6.0.txt
Tropopause: http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/v6.0/ttp/uahncdc_tp_6.0.txt
Lower Stratosphere: http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/v6.0/tls/uahncdc_ls_6.0.txt
SLOT PG Demo version enables you to practice playing slots games and improve your abilities before entering the real world. Make all of your investments worthwhile. Today, dreams can come true. Now is the time to apply for pg slot
I wanted to express my gratitude for this fantastic read!! I thoroughly enjoyed every minute of it. I’ve bookmarked you so I can come back and see what you’ve been up to. Check this Scholarships in Texas to brighten your day
Its not my first time to visit this web page, i am browsing this website daily and get fastidious information from here daily.
ถ้าคุณเป็นนักพนันที่กำลังมองหาโบนัสที่คุ้มกับการฝากของคุณเราขอเสนอ pg slot เครดิตฟรี เว็บไซต์ที่ให้บริการเกมสล็อตรูปแบบใหม่นี้ เว็บไซต์เรายินดีแจกเครดิตให้ลูกค้าทุกท่าน!! โดยฝากคราวแรกของวันก็รับโบนัสไปเลย ที่ pg-slot.game
clint…”He [Tim Folkerts] has stated that the flux from an ice cube will add to the same flux to heat a surface to 325K”.
***
It’s obvious that Tim, and his accomplice ,Barry, in the thread from earlier, do not understand the 2nd law, or even the meaning of flux.
If fluxes from separate radiative sources strike a surface, the flux density will increase at the surface. The fluxes don’t add at the surface, there are simply more flux lines per unit area.
If part of the fluxes are from a source hotter than the surface and the other part from a source cooler than the surface, like ice, only the fluxes from the hotter body will be absorbed. The rest will be completely ignored.
The meaning is clear. Energy from the Sun at an average of about 5500C will always be absorbed by the Earth’s surface but energy from the atmosphere that is in thermal equilibrium or cooler, can never be absorbed by the surface.
Barry raised the issue of a second Sun being introduced, using a red-herring argument, comparing the radiation from a second Sun to a block of ice being added to the equation.
Barry’s red-herring is similar to the red-herring issued by Eli Rabbett (Josh Halpern) against the point made by Gerlich & Tscheuschner that heat can only be transferred cold to hot, by its own means. Eli et al, with the aforementioned Arthur Smith in the ‘al’ peanut gallery, argued that would mean, with two bodies of different temperatures radiating close to each other, one of the bodies would not be radiating.
This egregious misunderstanding of the 2nd law has to stop. Clausius stated it in such a manner that even a child could understand it. Heat can never be transferred, by its own means, from a colder body to a hotter body. Later, he declared that applies equally to radiation.
He should not have had to point that out. No energy…anywhere…can be transferred from a region of lower potential energy to a region of higher potential energy by its own means. That is a serious no-brainer.
speak for you.
comprare patente di Guida